Mix one sound of a piece, though dry in comparison with two. I certainly want human to be best!Īs non of us know which is which I will simply state my preference on first attempt.ġST IMPRESSION COMPARISON ON SMALL PASSIVE SPEAKERS I hope human is best, and I hope my comments are helpful. The only processing was that it's normalized to -0.5db. Once there is a good number of responses, I'll reveal which master is which! I was trying to put the poll up here and at home recording, but couldn't figure it out. I've got this going here and the Home recording forum (). Or here's a direct link ( sBBk3A/viewform) to the poll: I also put a little poll on my website at I created a Zip of the various audio files along with a Reaper project and put them into google drive. In no particular order, the tracks were mastered using the following:Ī self re-master of the song, which I did using reaper plugins as well as Melda Production Plugins.Ī Professional Mastering Engineer - John Scrip of Massive Mastering I encoded the files from the original wave file masters using Reaper 5 and the lame mp3 encoder.
#Landr mastering review 2016 320kbps
So, I decided on using High Quality Mp3s encoded at 320kbps using the extreme encoding settings in Reaper. I wanted things to be as real world as possible, but I also wanted the test to be highly accessible. So, I figured I would do a little shoot out using a song I had mastered by a professional Mastering engineer. The wave of opinions and such on automated mastering seems to range from "amazing!" to "terrible!". I've always been interested in Mastering and the Auto Mastering online services got my attention.
0 kommentar(er)
